Muscle stability deficits and musculoskeletal complaints in football players: Adaptive Force Ratio outperforms conventional strength parameters--a cross-sectional study with preliminary follow-up

ObjectiveGiven the high injury burden in football and the documented limitations of strength-based screening, novel approaches are warranted. Adaptive Force (AF)--being closer to injury-prone movements than pushing/pulling strength--offers an alternative. This study examined the association between AF-based muscle stability and musculoskeletal complaints in football players and compared AF-derived and conventional strength parameters in their discriminative capacity, complemented by a preliminary prospective follow-up. MethodsAF and maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) were measured in 23 male football players across five bilateral muscle groups (knee extensors/flexors; hip flexors/adductors/abductors). AF parameters (maximal isometric AF, maximal AF, AF-Ratio), MVIC and hamstrings-to-quadriceps (H:Q) ratio were compared between players with and without complaints assessed via questionnaire at baseline and six-month follow-up (n=13). ResultsStability deficits were strongly associated with complaints (OR=54.0, 82% side concordance). AF-Ratio discriminated clearly between players with and without complaints (d=-1.47), with hip abductors showing the strongest effect (d=-1.64). Players with subsequent complaints showed lower baseline AF-Ratio (d=-1.45) and more stability deficits (d=1.67). MVIC and H:Q ratio did not discriminate (p>0.430). ConclusionThe findings suggest that muscle stability assessment outperforms conventional strength parameters in discriminating players with and without complaints, with preliminary follow-up data providing tentative support for predictive value. The concept of functional instability syndrome (FIS) provides a mechanistic framework for non-contact injuries and musculoskeletal complaints. AF assessment offers potential for screening, including return-to-sport decisions. Further studies are needed to verify the results, investigate predictive value, and evaluate whether personalised stability-based interventions can reduce injury incidence. What is already known on this topicO_LIConventional strength-based screening has shown limited predictive value for injuries in football, with no strength parameter reaching significance in meta-analysis. C_LIO_LIAdaptive Force (AF) assesses adaptive holding capacity (muscle stability)--a neuromuscular function closer to injury-prone movements than conventional strength; its association with musculoskeletal complaints in athletes and specifically in football players was unknown. C_LI What this study addsO_LIStability deficits (impaired holding capacity) were strongly associated with musculoskeletal complaints (OR=54.0) with preliminary prospective support, whereas maximal pushing strength and H:Q ratio did not discriminate. C_LIO_LIHip abductors showed the strongest association with complaints across all body regions--a muscle group rarely included in conventional screening. C_LI How this study might affect research, practice or policyO_LIAF assessment may complement or refine current screening and prevention strategies by identifying neuromuscular impairments not detected by conventional strength methods, supporting a shift towards stability-based screening, pending prospective validation. C_LI