pipette
ENEnglish

Automated Segmentation of Intracranial Arteries on 4D Flow MRI for Hemodynamic Quantification

J. Zhang, A. S. Verschuur, P. van Ooij, E. M. Schrauben, M. K. Bakker, K. M. Nam, I. C. van der Schaaf, C. M. W. Tax

PreprintUso en el mundo real

En palabras de los autores

Accurate vessel segmentation is essential for reliable hemodynamic quantification in 4D Flow MRI. Automated segmentation with deep learning offers a promising alternative to the time-consuming, operator-dependent manual segmentation, but its application is often hindered by the scarcity of labeled datasets. Moreover, while a previous study has evaluated the impact of automated vs manual segmentation on downstream intracranial hemodynamic quantification, it remains to be explored whether variability between different automated segmentation methods affects hemodynamic quantification significantly, particularly in the context of intracranial 7T 4D Flow MRI. We investigated a transfer learning-based intracranial artery segmentation model using a 3D full-resolution nnU-Net, pretrained on 355 TOF-MRA scans and fine-tuned on 11 7T 4D Flow MRI scans. The model was compared with two published models: a direct-transfer U-Net pretrained only on TOF-MRA without 4D Flow MRI fine-tuning, and a DenseNet U-Net trained from scratch on the same 11 7T 4D Flow MRI scans. Segmentation performance was evaluated against the manual reference on test sets with different resolutions and the impact on downstream hemodynamic quantification was assessed. The transfer learning-based nnU-Net achieved the highest Dice score (>0.85), the lowest HD95 ([~]3 mm), and the highest ICCs in cross-sectional area (0.62-0.87, except PCAs) and mean blood flow (0.78- 0.98). For wall shear stress (WSS) quantification, the transfer learning-based nnU-Net segmentations achieved the closest agreement with the manual reference (mean = 1.57 {+/-} 0.63 Pa, ICC = 0.96; max = 2.16 {+/-} 1.05 Pa, ICC = 0.97) and minimal bias ([&le;] 1.7%), whereas U-Net and DenseNet U-Net showed systematic under-(-5%) and overestimation (+7%), respectively. However, several vessel segments, including the ACA for DenseNet U-Net and the BA for U-Net, showed statistically significant differences (ANOVA post-hoc correction P < 0.05) in the flow-related metrics when compared with the manual reference. These results demonstrate that the transfer learning-based nnU-Net can provide accurate automated intracranial artery segmentation for 7T 4D flow MRI, and that segmentation accuracy directly affects 4D Flow MRI- derived hemodynamic quantification.

Resultado principalLimitación que admiten los autores

Apareció: jueves, 24 de septiembre. medRxiv. Preprint, todavía sin revisión por pares.

DOI: 10.64898/2026.03.09.26347567