Resolving the Dual-Timescale Forecasting Dilemma in High-Frequency Cyber-Physical Telemetry via Physics-Grounded Dynamic Asymptotic Decomposition
En palabras de los autores
High-frequency industrial cyber-physical systems (CPS) stream continuous sensor telemetry at sub-10-second intervals. Multi-horizon forecasting over hours is required for predictive maintenance and operational control. However, deploying machine learning models over extended horizons (H = 2,160 steps at dt = 5 s) encounters the Dual-Timescale Forecasting Dilemma: the trade-off between short-horizon kinetic momentum and long-horizon diurnal thermodynamic equilibrium. Autoregressive rollouts suffer from compounding error drift, while direct multi-output projectors exhibit variance explosion and noise extrapolation. In this work, we prove that autoregressive mutual information decays exponentially toward zero over extended lead times, and that the optimal minimum-variance estimator converges asymptotically to the periodic diurnal baseline (Lemma 1 and Theorem 1). Guided by these bounds, we propose the Dynamic Asymptotic Decomposition (DAD) framework. The architecture couples a continuous sigmoidal authority transition schedule \(\alpha(h)\) with monotonic L2 regularization scaling \(\lambda(h)\), transferring prediction authority from kinetic autoregression to diurnal equilibrium while enforcing physical non-negativity. Evaluated across a 30-day industrial telemetry stream (N = 518,400 steps) over 16 walk-forward test windows, DAD achieves an overall Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 0.1764, representing a 78.3% error reduction over Deep LSTM (0.8143), 60.2% over PatchTST (0.4431), and 20.8% over DLinear (0.2227). Computational profiling demonstrates edge execution in 0.72 ms with 0.203 MFLOPs and 72k parameters on a single CPU core (over 3400x faster than Transformer baselines), validated by an automated dual-stage CI/CD quality assurance harness and physical fail-safe architecture.
Apareció: lunes, 28 de septiembre. arXiv. Preprint, todavía sin revisión por pares.
Comentario de los autores: 33 pages, 16 figures, 8 tables, 17 equations