Automated Artifact Removal in EEG Age Prediction: A systematic comparison
En palabras de los autores
Automated EEG artifact removal may improve downstream analysis but can also alter predictive information. We benchmarked nine automated artifact removal methods against a common no-artifact-removal baseline for cross-dataset EEG age prediction. We introduce Signal Quality Index (SQI)-guided GEDAI, which leverages local signal-quality assessment to restrict correction to the channel--epoch pairs requiring intervention. Three deep neural architectures were trained on TUEG and evaluated without target-domain fitting on ds005385, LEMON, and TDBRAIN. Across this setting, GEDAI and SQI-guided GEDAI were the only methods with consistent gains over baseline in age prediction performance across all datasets and architectures (MAE years, , respectively). The remaining methods were neutral or detrimental on average (MAE years, across methods). The two GEDAI-based methods achieved closely matched performance, while SQI guidance reduced the median modification ratio from to . These findings show that curation benefits are method-dependent and establish SQI guidance as a more selective operating point, leaving more of the original EEG unchanged and limiting the potential loss of neural activity while retaining most of GEDAI's predictive benefit.
Apareció: lunes, 28 de septiembre. arXiv. Preprint, todavía sin revisión por pares.