Nearest but Not Dearest: Shared Curator-Feedback Infrastructure for Content-Only Search and Recommendation

A deployed B2B music-discovery platform serves both query-driven search (text prompts, vibe tags) and seed-driven recommendation (seed-track and artist stations) over one licensed catalog, one LAION-CLAP joint audio-text embedding space, one candidate-generation filter, and one ranking head -- and neither path consumes end-listener behavioral signal. In this content-only regime, curator judgment is the principal feedback signal available, and offline cosine similarity predicts it poorly: 38% of cosine-nearest neighbors are rejected by curators. The rejections reveal a clean partition: a majority (55%) are sound failures the encoder could address (style, tempo, mood mismatch), and a substantial minority (37%) are context failures orthogonal to the waveform (wrong language, holiday content, devotional content, rights and lyric flags). We deploy this sound-vs-context decomposition as feedback infrastructure, routing each failure mode to the layer that can absorb it: context failures to a constraint filter at candidate generation, sound failures to an embedding reweighting head at the representation layer -- both below the search/recommendation split, so a single curator loop maintains both experiences. On 1,200 curator judgments collected over two production rounds one month apart, the combined intervention reduces rejection rate from 38.17% to 28.83% (-24.5% relative, McNemar chi-squared = 22.4, p = 2.2e-6). An accounting decomposition attributes 4.08 pp of the drop to filter-eligible categories and 5.25 pp to the rest; the deployment was unblinded and compound, so this is a production accounting bound, not a causal estimate. We present this as an industrial case study rather than a validated general method, and close with lessons for content-only discovery: the failure partition is orthogonal to the paradigm partition, and corrections land in layers shared by both paradigms.