When Visual Quality Misleads: Intent Recognition under Rendered Avatar Distortions
En palabras de los autores
Avatar-streaming systems are commonly evaluated with image and video quality assessment (IQA/VQA) metrics, implicitly treating visual fidelity as a proxy for communicative success. We test this assumption through a controlled behavioral study of rendered 3D avatars across a pristine condition and fourteen geometric, photometric, temporal, and combined distortions. Fifty-nine participants contributed 2,688 judgments of perceived action, response confidence, and visual quality. We identify Misleading Quality in this dataset as distorted renderings that retain above-average perceived quality but yield below-average action-recognition accuracy. We also derive an Intent Quality Score (IQS) combining recognition correctness and confidence as the behavioral target for objective metrics. Among 126 distorted content--condition cells, 31 (24.6%) exhibited Misleading Quality; temporal and geometric distortions showed the highest rates, at 50.0% and 31.1%, respectively. The results reveal a quality--accuracy dissociation where distortion families affect appearance and communication differently. Across 24 direct-scoring IQA/VQA metrics and three supervised feature-regression baselines, alignment with IQS remained limited; at , the best leave-one-content-out baseline reached PLCC . Under this controlled protocol, visual fidelity alone is insufficient for avatar communication, motivating intent-aware quality assessment and streaming objectives.
Apareció: jueves, 24 de septiembre. arXiv. Preprint con versión publicada.
Versión publicada: 10.1145/3829339.3847861
Comentario de los autores: Accepted to SIGGRAPH Asia 2026 Technical Communications. 6 pages