pipette
ENEnglish

Common-Loss Parameter-Efficiency Analysis of MLP and KAN Neural Receivers for Digital Communications

Sude Ertan, Osman Tokluoglu, Enver Cavus

PreprintUso en el mundo real

En palabras de los autores

Classical coherent binary phase-shift keying (BPSK) reception over additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channels is analytically well understood, and the optimum hard-decision detector is known. Therefore, the aim of using neural receivers in this study is not to replace the classical AWGN-BPSK detector. Instead, the AWGN-BPSK setting is deliberately selected as a theoretically verifiable benchmark for analyzing how compactly neural receiver architectures can represent a known decision behavior. This paper compares multi-layer perceptron (MLP) and Kolmogorov--Arnold Network (KAN) receivers using a multi-SNR Nyquist-rate BPSK dataset. The models are evaluated using bit error rate (BER), mean squared error (MSE), and trainable parameter count. Beyond reporting accuracy alone, this work emphasizes a common-loss parameter-efficiency perspective: when two receivers reach a comparable practical BER or loss region, the receiver with fewer parameters is more attractive for real-time deployment. The results show that both MLP and KAN receivers reproduce the expected AWGN-BPSK detection trend, while a compact KAN configuration reaches a comparable operating region with substantially fewer trainable parameters. In particular, the KAN receiver with 3281 parameters achieves a test BER of 2.45 x 10^-4, while the MLP baseline with 8513 parameters achieves a test BER of 2.50 x 10^-4. This corresponds to approximately 61.5% fewer trainable parameters at a comparable BER operating point. This reduction is important for real-time neural receivers because it affects memory footprint, parameter access, inference latency, energy consumption, and hardware feasibility on embedded, software-defined radio, FPGA, ASIC, and edge communication platforms.

Resultado principalEl resumen no menciona limitaciones.

Apareció: miércoles, 23 de septiembre. arXiv. Preprint, todavía sin revisión por pares.

Comentario de los autores: 6 pages, 3 tables, 2 figures