pipette
ENEnglish

A Compact Stance-Indexed Anterior-Posterior COP Representation for Parkinson's Disease Classification from Plantar VGRF

Md. Sifat, Sania Akter, Akif Islam, Md. Ekramul Hamid

PreprintUso en el mundo real

En palabras de los autores

Parkinson's disease alters gait and bilateral coordination, but machine-learning performance also depends on how continuous gait signals are represented. This study investigates whether preserving anterior-posterior center-of-pressure (AP-COP) information at fixed locations across normalized stance provides a compact and informative representation of plantar-force gait signals. Bilateral vertical ground reaction force recordings from 165 participants in the Gait in Parkinson's Disease Database were evaluated using repeated fully nested participant-level cross-validation. We propose AP-COP10, comprising AP-COP position and bilateral asymmetry across five stance windows. AP-COP10 achieved an AUC of 0.894 and outperformed three harmonized literature-derived COP representations under the same evaluation pipeline. The complementary 25 non-AP-COP descriptors alone achieved an AUC of 0.856, while the complete 35-feature representation achieved 0.908. Removing AP-COP10 from the complete representation produced a statistically supported loss in discrimination, whereas adding the complementary descriptors to AP-COP10 yielded only a small, unsupported improvement. Feature competition indicated that the most informative stance-indexed descriptors were concentrated in early and early-mid stance, while source-study holdout and sensor-perturbation analyses supported the robustness of the representation. These findings indicate that stance-indexed AP-COP retains discriminative information that is not readily recovered by broader engineered gait descriptors, supporting compact and interpretable representations for machine-learning analysis of pathological gait.

Resultado principalEl resumen no menciona limitaciones.

Apareció: martes, 22 de septiembre. arXiv. Preprint, todavía sin revisión por pares.

Comentario de los autores: 24 pages, 7 figures; supplementary material is included in the same PDF