Beyond the Desert Label: A Pathway Diagnostic for User-Centered Smart Mobility Service Design

Smart-city mobility platforms increasingly rely on spatial screening tools to identify neighborhoods where public transit fails dependent users, but a single transit desert label can mask very different user problems: localized mismatch between service and concentrated need, or basic absence of usable service. These call for different user-centered responses. This paper introduces a pathway-based, reproducible, data-driven diagnostic that distinguishes relative transit mismatch from minimum-service failure and reports the specific service attributes (frequency, span, weekend service, walking access, and destination accessibility) driving each classification. The workflow combines open data (GTFS, ACS, LEHD, Census, and OpenStreetMap), detects spatially coherent mismatch using Local Moran's I, and applies an equity-informed service-failure test that centers vulnerable users. Applied to Baltimore, Philadelphia, Nashville, and Dallas, the diagnostic shows that legacy-transit cities are dominated by localized mismatch, while auto-oriented cities show broader minimum-service failure, with distinct service-deficit profiles in each case. By making the mechanism behind an under-service label explicit, the tool supports more inclusive, user-centered smart-mobility planning across cities with different transit baselines.