From tau-tilting to tau2-tilting via splitting tilting triples

Zhongyuan Wang; Haicheng Zhang; Tiwei Zhao

In the authors' words

Let $(A, T, B)$ be a splitting tilting triple. We provide a construction of $τ_{2}$ -tilting $B$ -modules from $τ$ -tilting $A$ -modules. On the other hand, if $A$ is hereditary, by considering the mutation of a certain two-term silting complex of $A$ and its image under the derived equivalence $R Hom_{A} (T, -) : D^{b} (A) \to D^{b} (B)$ , we get a three-term silting complex $W$ of $B$ . Under an explicit non-vanishing condition on the cones of morphisms between the two summands, we prove that $H^{0} W$ is a basic $2$ -tilting $B$ -module and that it coincides with the module obtained from the first construction. As an application, we generalize the construction of Peng from tilting modules to $τ$ -tilting modules. We also determine the endomorphism algebra of the constructed module as an explicit triangular matrix algebra, which is derived equivalent to $A$ and $B$ whenever the constructed module is $2$ -tilting, and give a full semi-orthogonal decomposition of $K^{b} (proj A)$ .

Main resultLimitation the authors admit

From τ-tilting to τ2​-tilting via splitting tilting triples

In the authors' words

More on Algebra & number theory that day

Inverse Baer deformations and finite simple skew braces of nilpotent type

Mathematical Principles of a Generalized Tonal Practice

A Machine-Checked Proof that Gardam's A~2​ Lattice Does Not Have Unique Products

On Z2​-extensions of real quadratic fields with class group of 2-rank three

Affine Harish-Chandra center in positive characteristic

From $τ$ -tilting to $τ_{2}$ -tilting via splitting tilting triples

A Machine-Checked Proof that Gardam's $A ~_{2}$ Lattice Does Not Have Unique Products

On $Z_{2}$ -extensions of real quadratic fields with class group of $2$ -rank three