The large sieve for square moduli under Hooley's hypothesis
In the authors' words
Let be Zhao's large sieve sum with square moduli. At the critical point the best known unconditional bound, due to Baier and Zhao (2008), is , against the conjectured , and the exponent has not been lowered since. We prove that, under Hooley's Hypothesis for short Sali\'e sums -- square-root cancellation for over arbitrary subintervals of a period -- one has at . The key estimate is a bound for the number of fractions , , within of a point near : we show for every modulus , improving the bound obtained by Baier (2026) for only, and reaching every modulus. The proof rests on a single observation: a sum of modular square roots over an interval is, after completion and an exact evaluation of quadratic Gauss sums at every modulus, times a Sali\'e sum of length . Hypothesis therefore yields square-root cancellation for these sums directly, at every modulus, without Weyl differencing; the saving over the trivial bound is the square of what the Weyl-differencing route gives. The Gauss-sum evaluations, including even moduli and coefficients sharing a factor with the modulus, are proved in full. The paper was prepared in collaboration with Claude (Anthropic); Section 1.9 sets out what each of us contributed.
Appeared: Monday, September 21. arXiv. Preprint, not yet peer-reviewed.
Authors' comment: 30 pages